The Hidden Threat: When "Cured" Hepatitis B Awakens in Cancer Patients

Understanding hepatitis B virus reactivation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection

Hepatitis B Lymphoma Reactivation Immunosuppression

Introduction

Imagine finishing cancer treatment, only to face a life-threatening liver infection you didn't know you still carried. This isn't theoretical—it's the reality for many non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with a history of hepatitis B. In 2025, doctors reported a tragic case of a patient who had apparently beaten hepatitis B decades earlier. Their blood tests showed protective antibodies, all traces of the virus seemed gone, and they had no symptoms. Then came lymphoma treatment with powerful immunosuppressive drugs, including rituximab. Suddenly, the hepatitis B virus reactivated violently, appearing without the usual antibody response, ultimately proving fatal despite medical intervention 5 .

Key Fact

This scenario represents one of oncology's most insidious complications: hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. For the millions living with both resolved hepatitis B and blood cancers, this threat looms large during treatment.

The very therapies that save them from cancer can inadvertently awaken dormant viruses, with potentially devastating consequences. Understanding this phenomenon isn't just academic—it's crucial for patient safety, affecting treatment decisions and outcomes across medical specialties.

The Silent Threat: How a "Resolved" Infection Can Awaken

The Stealthy Nature of Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is notoriously difficult to completely eradicate from the human body. Unlike many viruses that leave after acute infection, HBV has a remarkable ability to embed its genetic material permanently inside liver cells. This occurs through covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), which serves as a molecular blueprint for producing new virus particles 8 .

Even when the immune system successfully controls the infection—clearing the detectable virus from the blood and producing protective antibodies—these viral blueprints can remain dormant in the liver for decades, waiting for an opportunity to reawaken 8 .

When Immunity Fails: The Reactivation Process

Under normal circumstances, the immune system—particularly B-cells and T-cells—maintains constant surveillance, suppressing any hepatitis B virus that tries to reactivate from these reservoirs. However, when patients receive immunosuppressive therapies for conditions like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, this delicate balance is disrupted 8 .

B-cell depleting therapies like rituximab pose particular risk because they directly target the very cells that produce antibodies against viruses like hepatitis B 6 8 .

Reactivation Timeline

Initial Infection

HBV establishes infection with cccDNA forming reservoirs in liver cells

Immune Control

Immune system controls viral replication; patient develops antibodies (anti-HBs, anti-HBc)

Immunosuppression

Cancer treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy) weakens immune surveillance

Viral Reactivation

Dormant HBV begins replicating, potentially leading to hepatitis flares and liver damage

Groundbreaking Research: A Closer Look at HBV Reactivation

Uncovering Risks in "Double-Negative" Patients

While we've long known that patients with active hepatitis B or positive core antibodies face reactivation risks, a 2025 study from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital made a startling discovery: even lymphoma patients who tested negative for both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA—the so-called "double-negative" patients—could experience reactivation 1 9 .

This comprehensive research analyzed 616 double-negative lymphoma patients treated between 2019 and 2021. The results challenged conventional medical wisdom:

  • 7.14% (44 of 616 patients) experienced HBV reactivation during treatment 9
  • Reactivation risk was 7.52 times higher in patients with hepatitis B core antibody (10.00%) compared to those without (1.46%) 1 9
  • Patients over 60 years old showed significantly elevated reactivation rates (12.08%) 1 9

Research Findings

Characteristic Category Number of Patients Reactivation Cases Reactivation Rate
HBcAb Status Positive 410 41 10.00%
Negative 206 3 1.46%
Age Group ≤60 years 376 15 3.99%
>60 years 240 29 12.08%
Gender Male 358 24 6.70%
Female 258 20 7.75%
Risk Assessment for HBV Reactivation
Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk
HBcAb Negative
1.46% risk
Age ≤60
3.99% risk
Age >60
12.08% risk
HBcAb Positive
10.00% risk

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Methods

Studying hepatitis B reactivation requires sophisticated laboratory tools to detect subtle changes in viral behavior and immune response. The Guangdong study employed several advanced techniques that represent the gold standard in viral hepatitis research 9 :

Cobas E602 Analyzer

Function: Fully automated electrochemiluminescence detection

Application: Quantifies HBsAg and HBcAb with high precision

COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan System

Function: Automated nucleic acid extraction and amplification

Application: Detects and quantifies HBV DNA levels as low as 20 IU/mL

Dedicated Roche Reagent Kits

Function: Specific binding to viral antigens and DNA

Application: Ensures consistent, reproducible test results across studies

cobas® HBV DNA Test

Function: Quantitative PCR for viral load measurement

Application: Tracks minute changes in viral replication activity

These tools enabled the researchers to detect reactivation early and monitor its progression with precision. The extreme sensitivity of modern PCR systems—capable of detecting as few as 20 international units of viral DNA per milliliter of blood—was particularly crucial for identifying reactivation in its earliest stages 9 .

Prevention and Management: Turning Research into Practice

Updated Guidelines for a Growing Threat

In response to mounting evidence, medical organizations have updated their guidelines. The American Gastroenterological Association's 2025 recommendations emphasize:

  • Universal HBV screening for all adults before immunosuppressive therapy 6
  • Antiviral prophylaxis for high-risk patients, including those receiving B-cell depleting agents 6
  • Regular monitoring of HBV DNA and liver enzymes during and after immunosuppression

The Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver similarly recommends triple-panel testing (HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc) for all adults, reflecting growing recognition that reactivation risk extends beyond the obvious candidates 4 .

High-Risk Drug Classes
  • B-cell depleting agents (e.g., rituximab) High Risk
  • Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., ibrutinib, zanubrutinib) High Risk
  • Anthracycline derivatives Medium Risk
  • High-dose corticosteroids (longer than one month) Medium Risk
Special Consideration: Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

The case of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors is particularly instructive—a 2025 study documented the first HBV-related death in a patient receiving zanubrutinib despite previous entecavir prophylaxis, highlighting the potent immunosuppression of these newer agents 7 .

Conclusion: Navigating the Future of HBV Reactivation Management

The silent threat of hepatitis B reactivation in apparently cured patients represents one of modern medicine's most challenging paradoxes: how to manage invisible viral reservoirs awakened by life-saving treatments. The tragic case of the anti-HBs positive, anti-HBc positive lymphoma patient who succumbed to reactivation reminds us that our current screening methods, while improved, remain imperfect 5 .

Key Insights
  • Current serological markers may miss some at-risk individuals
  • Age plays a more significant role than previously recognized
  • Even "double-negative" patients can experience reactivation
Future Directions
  • Development of more sensitive detection methods
  • Personalized risk assessment models
  • Updated guidelines for newer immunotherapies

The groundbreaking discovery that reactivation can occur even in double-negative patients underscores how much we still have to learn about viral latency 1 9 . It suggests that current serological markers may miss some at-risk individuals and that age plays a more significant role than previously recognized.

As cancer treatments evolve toward more targeted immunotherapies, the landscape of HBV reactivation risk will continue to shift. The recent inclusion of CAR-T cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors as recognized risk factors in major guidelines demonstrates this evolving understanding 2 8 .

Clinical Recommendation

For patients and doctors alike, the lesson is clear: comprehensive HBV screening using the triple panel (HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc) should be standard before starting any immunosuppressive therapy. For those with evidence of past infection, close consultation with both oncologists and liver specialists is essential to balance cancer treatment efficacy with hepatitis B reactivation prevention.

Though challenges remain, the growing recognition of this threat—and the development of clearer management guidelines—offers hope that future patients can receive life-saving cancer treatments without awakening this sleeping dragon.

References